Page 210
90. Basil, Ep., 234.1; cf. 235.2; 236.1ff; Con Eun., 2.32
91. Thus Didymus, De Sp. St., 23ff, 60f; De Trin., 2.6.7, could speak of the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit as the presence of God secundum substantium, and not merely secundum opertaitionem. Contrast Basil Ep., 234.1-3; 235.2f; Con Eun., 1.14, 23; 2.32; De obs se, 7, Athens ed., 54, p. 36 (N/A); cf. Gregory Naz., Or., 38.7, Athanasius, De decr., 11, cannot be understood in this way. See further Theol. in Reconc., pp. 210, 213ff; Theol. in Reconc., pp. 235f; and E. L. Mascall, Existence and Analogy, 1949, pp. 148ff.
92. Matt. 12.31f; Mark 3.28f; Luke 12.10
See Athanasius, Con Ar., 1.50; Ad Jov., 1; Ad Afr., 11; Ad Ser., 1.1f; 3.7, 3.8ff, 16ff, Athens ed., 33, p. 139f, 143ff (N/A); Basil De Sp St 46, 70 75; Hom 111.5ff; Con Eun., 2.33; Or. 35; Ep., 152.3 (typo? maybe 159.2); 188.1; 251.4; Gregory Nyss., De Sp. St., Jaeger, 3.1, p. 106f; Gregory Naz., Or. 31.30; Didymus De Trin., 2.26; 3.2.54; 3.40; De Sp. St., 1, 63; Con Eun., Athens ed., 44, p. 259; Amphilochius, Con haer., 17; Ep. syn., 4; Epiphanius Anc., 69, 116; Haer., 54.2; 74.6, 14; Cyril of Jer., Cat., 4.16; 5.5; 16.1, 6, etc.
93. Athanasius Ad Jov., 4; Ad Ser., 1.31; Basil De Sp. St., 3, 26, 64, 73; Ep., 90.2; 159.2; 258.2; Gregory Naz., Or., 31.12, 28; Gregory Nyss., De Sp. St. Jaeger, 3.1., pp. 92ff, 108ff; Ep., 24. Amphilochius, MPG, 39.97B; Didymus, De Trin., 2.21f; Con Eun., Athens ed., 44, pp. 245, 247; Epiphanius Anc., 70, 117, 119; Haer., 70.6; Cyril of Jer., Cat., 4.16; 16.1ff.
94. Apost. Const., 8.12; Serapion Euch 13, Athens ed., 43, p. 76; Basil Lit., Athens ed., 56, p. 28f (cf Brightman, op cit., p. 402); De Sp St., 38; Gregory Nyss., Con Eun., 1.23; Athanasius In ill. om., 6; Epiphanius, Haer 76. Ref. Aet 10; Anc., 9, 26, 69; Didymus De Trin., 2.7, 19; Cyril of Jer., Cat., 23.6; Gregory Naz., Or., 34.13; 38.8 & 45.4: ‘This then is the Holy of Holies, completely veiled by the seraphim, and glorified with a thrice repeated ‘holy’ joined together in one ascription of Lordship and Deity.’ Cited by John of Damascus, De fide, 3.10. Cf. also the discussion of Isaiah’s version, 6.1, in Ps Athanasius, De Trin, et Sp. St., 16 and De inc et con Ar., 10
Page 211
95. Basil De Sp. St., 44, 53. Cf. 22, ‘His proper and peculiar title is “Holy Spirit,”which is a name specially appropriate to everything that is incorporeal, purely immaterial and indivisible.’
96. Epiphanius, Haer., 73.16, 25; 74.10ff; Anc., 8, 72ff.
97. Epiphanius Haer., 73.17; 74.7 – the corresponding passage in Anc 70 however, reads Πνεῦμα ἐκ Πατρός etc.
98. See Didymus De Trin., 3.36ff., Epiphanius, Anc., 6f, 10f, 67f, 73; Cyril of Jer., Cat., 16.3, 5, 13, 24.
99. John 14.16f, 25f; 15.26f, 16.13f. See Athanasius, Ad Ser., 1.20; 3.1; Con Ar., 1.15; 3.44; Hilary De Trin., 7.20; 8.20; Didymus, De Sp. St. 30-38; Cyril of Jer., Cat., 16.14; Epiphanius Haer., 48.12; 62.4, 7; 69.18, 34; 74.1, 4, 6, 9ff; 76.4, 7; Anc., 6ff, 11, 73, 120; Gregory De Sp St., Jaeger, 3.1, p. 108, etc.
Page 212
100.John 14.7. Cf. A. I. C. Heron, op. cit., p. 56: ‘The Spirit mirrors Christ himself, but to the “world” the mirror conveys no image.’
101. Thus Cyril of Alex., Thes., 34.
102. Ps. Athanasius/Basil Con. Sab., 12; Cf. Gregory of Nyssa., De Trin., Jaeger, 3.1, p. 13.
103. See Gregory/Basil Ep., 38.4
104. Basil De Sp. St., 47: “No one knows the Father but the Son” (Matt 11.27). And “no man can say that Jesus is Lord but in the Holy Spirit” (1Cor. 12.3) For it is not said through the Spirit but in the Spirit, and “God is Spirit, (4.24), as it is written “in their light we shall see light” (Ps. 36.9), namely by the illumination of the Spirit, “the true light that enlightens every that comes into the world” (John 1.9).
105. Cf. Basil, De Sp. St., 22f; 46f.
106. Basil Ep., 236. Also De Sp. St., 64; ‘It is impossible to see the image of the invisible God, except in the illumination of the Spirit. And in directing our gaze upon the image, we cannot sever the light from the image, for that which causes our seeing is necessarily seen with what is seen. Thus rightly and appropriately it is through the shining of the Spirit that we see the brightness of God’s glory, and through the express Image are led up to him of whom he is the express Image and the exact Seal.
Page 213
107. Athanasius Ad Ser., 1.30 & 1.19
108. Gregory Naz., Or., 40.1. See also Or., 39.1; Ps Gregory Naz., Ep., 243; Gregory Nyss., De Sp. St., Jaeger 3.1, p. 108f; Epiphanius, Haer., 69.33; 70.5; 74.7f, 10; Anc., 61; Didymus, Con Eun., Athens ed., 44, p. 255f.
109. Didymus De Trin., 2.36; and Cyril of Alex., In Jn., 15.1
110. Athanasius, Ad Ser., 1.17. Hence the inherent difficulty we have in formulating a doctrine of the Spirit, for the Holy Spirit is God of God present to us in his mode of being as Spirit and thus precisely as the unknowable. See ‘The Epistemological Relevance of the Spirit,’ God and Rationality
Page 214
111. Basil Ep., 235.2: ‘We confess that we know what is knowable of God, and yet what we know reaches beyond our comprehension.’
112. Basil De Sp. St., 47.
113. Athanasius Ad Ser., 1.14, 19, 21, 30f; 4.4
114. Athanasius Ad Ser., 1.14
115. Athanasius Ad Ser., 1.19ff, 27f, 30f; 3.5; Didymus, De Sp. St., 34-39; De Trin., 2.1; Basil Con Eun., 3.4; Gregory/Basil, Ep., 189.6f; Gregory Nyss., non tres die, Jaeger vol. 3.1 pp. 47, 55f; cf. Ex comm. not., Jaeger, 3.1, pp. 3f; De Sp. St., Jaeger, 3.1, pp. 97-100, 105ff, 109; Gregory Naz., Or., 31.6, 16.
Page 215
116. 1Cor. 2.10f This passage had a powerful influence on Nicene theology – see Athanasius, In Ill. om., 1; Exp. fidei, 2; Ad Ser., 1.6, 15, 22, 26; 3.1; 4.1; Basil, De Sp. St., 10, 38, 40, 50; Con Eun., 1.14; Gregory Nyssa Con Eun., 2, Jaeger, 1, pp. 289, 340; 3, 1, II, p. 160; Gregory Naz., Or., 28.6; 30.15; 40.9; 43.65; Amphilochius Fr., 5; Cyril of Jer., Cat., 4.16; 6.6; 11.13; 16.23; Didymus, Con. Man. 40; De Trin., 1.9, 15; 2.2f, 5, 6.14f, 7.8; 3.37; De Sp. St., 15, 31, 40, 54f; Con Eun., Athens ed., pp. 232, 251f, 255, 266; Epiphanius Anc., 7, 12, 15f, 68, 117; Haer., 74.1, 5, 11, 13; 76.29.
117. Epiphanius Anc., 73; cf. 15f (16); Haer., 74.1o, 76, Ref. Aet., 29 (76).
Page 216
118. See again Athanasius, Con Ar., 1.9, 46; 3.1-6; De syn., 41-53; Ad Ser., 1.27; 2.2, 5.
119. Athanasius Ad Ser., 1.25-33; 3.1.
120. Epiphanius Anc., 6.
121. Athanasius Ad Ser., 1.2, 9-10.
122. Athanasius Ad Ser., 1.28
123. Athanasius Ad Ser., 1.30
Page 217
124. See especially Eunomius, Apologia 1 of 360, MPG, 30.835ff, and Apologia 2 of 378, preserved in the Con Eun., of Gregory Nyss., Jaeger, 1 & 2.
125. Athanasius, Ad Ant., 5-6
126. See Theol. in Reconc., pp. 242f. Thus also Gregory Naz., Or., 31.11: ‘God is three “Properties,” “Hypostases,” or “Persons” – call them what you will, we will not quarrel over names as long as they intend the same thing – that is Godhead.’ And 43.68: ‘Salvation lies not in terms but in the reality they express.’
Page 218
127. Basil Con Eun., 1-3, Athens ed., 52, pp. 157-227; Antir., pp. 143-156; Gregory Nyss. Con Eun., Jaeger, 1 & 2. See also Didymus, Con Eun. (Ps. Basil, Con Eun., 4-5), Athens ed., 44, pp. 223-261.
128. Basil Ep., 231
129. Basil, De Sp. St., 16f, 37, 41-47; Ep., 159; 189.5-8
130. Basil De Sp. St., 46; Con Sab., 6. Cf. Gregory Nyss., Con Eun., 1, Jaeger, 1, p. 89; non tres dei, 3.1, p. 56.
131. Eg., Basil Hex., 2.6.