Chapter 3 The Almighty Creator Footnotes 102-137

Home / Chapter 3 The Almighty Creator Footnotes 102-137

TheTrinitarian Faith

“In his earliest work, Contra Gentes, Athanasius had already singled out the basic question posited by the incarnation as to the relation of the one and only begotten Word of God, who is unchanging, unlimited and cot composite in his being and nature, to things created out of nothing which are changing, limited and composite in their existence and nature. The answer to that question, however, he found in the incarnation itself, for it was the wonderful union of the Word with created things that showed that the nature of things created out of nothing, when considered in themselves, is not only weak and mortal but fleeting or in a state of flux, and subject to dissolution even so far as its own laws are concerned. However, when created nature is considered in the perspective of the ungrudging goodness and loving-kindness of God, it is found to be maintained in being by the creating and ordering activity of the Word of God, and thus preserved by divine grace from lapsing back into nothing. It is indeed, as St Paul taught, through and in Christ that all things visible and invisible consist.”

Page 98

102. Athanasius Con. gent., 41 – reference is to Col. 1:15-18

Page 99

103. Athanasius De inc., 3; Cf. De decr., 18 where a similar statement is made.

104. Irenaeus, Ad haer. 1.15 (1.8.1), vol 1, p. 67; 2.1 (2.1.1), p. 251; 2.10.2 (2.11.1), p.274f; 2.47.2 (2.30.8), p. 367f; 3.8.3, vol. 2, p. 29f; Athanasius, Con. Ar., 2.24; 2.31; Ep. 11.4.

105. Athanasius Con gent., 41; De decr. 11; Contra Ar., 1.23 and 28. Cf. Basil Con Eun., 2.23; Gregory Naz., or., 28.22.

106. Cf Athanasius, Con gent., 39 and 41; De decr., 11, etc.

107. Athanasius, De decr., 22; Con Ar., 1.20; 1.36; 4.2; cf. 3.65; See also Gregory Nyss., Con Eun., 1.26

108. Athanasius Con. Ar., 1.51; 3.62; In Ps., 88.36-37 (N/A).

109. Athanasius De inc., 2; cf. De decr., 19; De syn., 35

110. In modern Greek ἐνδεχόμενος is now used for ‘contingent,’ which is rather appropriate since ἐνδέχεται is the Greek equivalent of the Latin conting

Page 100

111. See John Philoponos, De aetern.mundi con. Proclum, 9.11-13 (N/A)

112. Mark 4.28

Page 101

113.  Aristides Ad Aut., 1.7 (N/A); Basil Hex., 3.1f; 4.1f; 5.1f; 8.1; De Sp St 16-37-38; 19.49

114.  Athanasius, De inc., 4ff


115. Athanasius, De inc., 3-10;

116. See Athanasius, Con Ar., 2.65-72, 74ff, 77; 3.33, 38; 4.33; Con gent., 40ff; De inc., 2ff & 44f

Page 103

117. Basil, Hex., 2.1; Gregory Nyssa., Con Eun., 1.22; De op. hom., 23, 29, 30; De an et res MPG 46.30B, 124B 125C.

118. Basil Hex., 6.1ff.

119. Athanasius, Con gent., 35ff: 40ff; 44 & 46: De decr., 11 Exp. fidei, 1; cf. Con Ar., 3.16

120. Athanasius Con. Ar., 2.2, 24, 31f etc. ; cf, Gregory Nyss., De op hom., 23f.

121. This was the underlying theme of both the Con. gent. and the De inc., but see especially Con gent., 29ff, 34ff, 38ff, 44, 46. Cf. Con. Ar., 2.28, 41

Page 104

122. Refer to my discussion of this in Space, Time and Incarnation, 1969; and in ‘The Relation of Incarnation to Space,’ my contribution to the Festschrifit for Georges Florovsky, The Ecumenical World of Orthodox Civilisation, Vol. III, 1974, pp. 42-70.

123. Athanasius Con Ar., 3.30; Ad Ant., 7

124. Athanasius Con gent., 11f, 26, 28, 32, 39, 41

125. Basil Hex, 4.2ff; 5.1f, 5; 8.5; 9.1ff; Gregory Nyss., Con Eun, 1.26

126. Basil Hex., 1.8-10; 3.1ff; 9.2ff. This view of the constancy of nature was reinforced by John Philoponos in the sixth Century in his De opoficio mundi, 3.4 and his lost Contra Aristotelem, fragments which are preserved by Simplicius, Comm. in Arist. Gr., vol. 10, pp. 329ff.

127. See especially Athanasius Con Ar., 1.20;.  2.2;  2.24;  3.36. Cf. his insistence that Jesus Christ himself is the will of God, Con Ar., 2.31; 3.63; and Gregory Nazianzen’s distinction between ‘the person who wills’ and ‘the act of willing,’ Or. 29.6 .

128. Athanasius Con. Ar., 1.20; 2.24, 29f..

129. Georges Florovsky, ‘The Concept of Creation in Athanasius,’ Studia Patristica, 1962, p. 37; Collected Works, Vol II, pp. 48, 57ff

130. Basil Hex., 5.4; Athanasius Con Ar., 2.31

Page 106

131. Origen Con. Cel., 5.7; Basil, Hex., 1.3; cf. particularly the stoic view of nature, J. von Arnim, Stoicorum veterum Fragmenta, Vol II, 1027; Cicero, De natura deorum, II. 22, 57, etc. Rejection of the eternity and the unchangeability of the world was the main theme of the works of John Philoponos, De aeternitate mundi contra Proclum and Contra Aristotelem.

132. Athenagoras, Leg., 6.3-4; 20.3; 22.12; 25.2; De res., 19.1-3. The same theme is found in the Con gent. and De inc., of Athanasius.

133. Athanasius, Con. Ar. 1.48f; 2.14, 56, 61ff, 67-69, 70-72; Ad Ant.,7

Page 108

134. Basil Hex., 3.8

135. Basil Hex 2.1f.

136. John Philoponos, de op mundi, 2.1ff, which was evidently influenced by Basil’s discussion in Hexaemeron 6.1ff; De aetern. mundi. Proclum, 1.6-8, etc.

Page 109

137. Cf. the statement of Aristides that God established everything on his own steadfastness (ἀσφάλεια), Ad Aut., 1.4. See Athanasius, Con Ar., 1.9, 35ff, 51f; 2.6-10; 3.36; De decr., 14; cf. de syn., 27.12; Con Apol., 1.12, 15 

Chapter 4 God of God, Light of Light Footnotes 1-24